McDonald v. City of Chicago — SCOTUS finds Chicago gun ban unconstitutional
I can hear it now…”activist judges…radicals in robes…blah, blah, blah.” The Supreme Court this morning ruled that Chicago’s gun ban, the strictest in the nation, is unconstitutional. Many, including myself, considered this to be inevitable following the Supremes striking down Washington D.C.’s gun ban. The only issue was whether the Second Amendment would be applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, like every other right set forth in the Bill of Rights has been. While a no-brainer after the Washington D.C. case created the necessary precedent, the vote was nonetheless 5-4.
I’m sure Mayor Daley is in his office right now, with his bottle of Jameson’s and tears streaming down his cheeks. He loved his gun ban. I’ve never been real sure why–maybe a deal with the mob. In recent years though, his position has become simply unsupportable given the number of shootings that have been occurring on the city’s outskirts daily. If the thugs have the guns, why can’t we?
Gangs are over-running neighborhoods in the city and shooting anything and everything that moves. That might be o.k. if Chicago was suffering from a bear problem; but when the bears are actually six year-olds playing outside at noon…or 2 a.m. (parents?), it usually turns out badly. It might also be o.k. if the nanny-state was actually good at protecting its citizens, instead of simply cleaning up the mess. Of course, the cops know who the gang-bangers are, but they aren’t allowed to go crack some heads like they used to do. Now, maybe the law-abiding citizens can defend themselves…or at least create the illusion of doing so.
Now if the Supreme Court would just rule that Illinois’ ban on me buying fun fireworks is unconstitutional due to it depriving me of happiness, I wouldn’t have to spend my entire Fourth of July figuring out how many snappers I had to tie together to blow up a styrofoam cup.