Well, it’s come to this. Society’s obsession with political-correctness (or is it just the public schools’ obsession with sex…hmmmm…) has turned the Bureaucracy of the Bored and Useless, i.e., public school administrators, on a seven year old kid for defending himself.
A 7-year-old boy is being investigated by his South Boston elementary school for possible sexual harassment after kicking another boy in the crotch.
Lynch’s son, Mark Curran, said the boy that he kicked had been bullying him on the school bus ride home from Tynan Elementary last week.
Sexual harassment? For a kick to the family jewels? By a seven year old? Did the kid perform some sort of ninja-cupping action with his foot in the process? The school’s explanation:
‘Your son kicked a little boy in the testicles. We call that sexual harassment,’ Lynch said the school told her.
I call it an unnatural obsession with testicles.
This is dumb. What happens if the B.B.S. finds that the seven year old actually acted with the intent of sexually harassing the bully? What if he was just being insensitive to the bully’s feelings? Is he then branded a sexual harasser? And what then? Does it go in the dreaded permanent file? Is there a special board in the school where the testicle-kickers are listed for purposes of scorn and mocking? Are there multiple boards? What about the “titty-twister” board? Or the “insensitive rhymes” board? I used to love the old “Chinese, Japanese, Dirty Knees, Look at These” chant. I don’t think I sexually harassed anyone. Of course, I was ten, so I’m not sure I knew what either sexual or harassment were, let alone what constituted sexual harassment. If I had known though, I wouldn’t have wasted my opportunity on the school bully, if you know what I mean (that was a veiled reference at holding hands. So calm down mom).
In any event, another wonderful example of your tax dollars at work.
September 16, 2010, 6:30 a.m.
-sigh- Another day another dollar. At least it’s raining today. I’ll finally be able to wash off that McDonald’s milkshake that the guy in the Prius tossed on me last week. Real environmentally friendly dill-hole.
Well, everyone looks pissed again. Not that I blame them. My buddies and I have been sitting in these spots for going on four months now. Plus, there are signs everywhere requiring everyone to slow down for the construction zone. Does my mere existence in this lane really constitute a construction zone? Not like it matters though…no one can drive faster than ten miles/hour anyway. And while the drivers mutter under their breath about ramming stuff, my buddies and I are occupying this perfectly good lane for miles just hoping that some day, actual construction will take place next to us. I’m afraid many of us are now beginning to lose that hope.
Yesterday seemed like it would be different. An orange IDOT truck pulled up next to me. I thought construction may actually start! But it was not to be. Instead of actually beginning to improve the roadway, two guys jumped out of the truck, rolled that measuring wheel thingy, laughed about something, and then got back into their truck and left. I was, I’ll admit, disappointed; and confused…did they really think the measurement changed since they took it a month ago?
My buddy Herb told me that he had actually spoken to a barrel further down the road that said construction was actually occurring. He said it was really strange because after all of these big machines tore up the road, everybody left for a couple of months. He said something about workers striking. He and I both thought it would have been nicer if the workers had decided to stop working before tearing up the road. But what do we know? We’re just barrels.
I still remember being placed here in the spring. I was so excited! I figured I’d get to watch some cool machines construct a road. When the drivers creeping past me first became angry, mumbling about the same construction being done last year, I smiled, because I knew the construction would be done in no time. But here I sit. Taking up a perfectly good lane when there hasn’t been construction equipment anywhere near me yet. Seriously, why close a lane for miles, when only about 10 feet is getting worked on at any given time? I mean, I know my brain consists of a flashing light, but it would seem that only closing the road being worked on would be a smarter idea.
However, after talking to my buddy Gilbert yesterday, I do think the drivers are being a little hard on the government. Apparently there are spots where the road isn’t being torn up at all. In fact, Gil told me that all of the toll lanes are still open, and there are lots of those. It could be worse, right?
Well, it’s September. I haven’t posted in a while because there’s been nothing going on. August was hot. Congress wasn’t in session. The Tigers’ season has been over for a while now. And I’ve been waiting for football to start.
But NOW, we’re officially into football and election season. WOO-HOO! While I could talk about football forever, this is not a football blog, and I’m not starting one now. This is primarily a political blog, and it’s a political time of year. And I can’t remember an election cycle that has been potentially more important than this one. Let’s review:
The economy still sucks. In fact, it’s worse then it was the last time I posted. Unemployment is up to 9.6%; we’ve lost another 54,000 jobs; and Christina Romer, one of Barry’s chief economic “experts” who is leaving the administration, has recently let all of us know that they’ve had absolutely no idea what they’ve been doing re: the economy.
She had no idea how bad the economic collapse would be. She still doesn’t understand exactly why it was so bad. The response to the collapse was inadequate. And she doesn’t have much of an idea about how to fix things.
That’s disheartening…and also completely obvious. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis has taken to authoring op-eds in the USA Today to try and convince America that the Democrat’s handling of the economy doesn’t resemble a monkey with a rubic’s cube.
The Recovery Act saved millions of American jobs — keeping health care providers in hospitals, teachers in classrooms, and police and firefighters on the beat. But the benefits weren’t just in the public sector. During the past eight months, the economy has averaged 95,000 new private sector jobs.
While I’d love to see her support for that last sentence, it doesn’t really matter. Unemployment will continue to go up until new jobs exceed 120,000/month (population increase). More importantly, there is no doubt that the economy is slowly getting worse.
The “summer of recovery” is followed by the “autumn of reality.” Let’s face it: if the Dems had any idea what to do about the economy, they would have done it by now.
B.O. has recently begun getting rid of the “drove it into a ditch” meme, and replaced it with “it’s taken us 10 years to get into this mess, so it’s unreasonable to think we could get out of the mess in 18 months” nonsense. Did it take us 10 years to get into this? I don’t know. I suppose one could reasonably argue it took one year, or even thirty-three years (the Community Reinvestment Act, which gave birth to the housing boom and bust, was enacted in 1977). I also don’t care how long it took us to get here. What I do care about is what is the current Administration doing about it? Well, it’s been 18 months and the answer is: spent a lot of money for nothing. Things haven’t improved, and the Dems are out of ideas.
So what should be done? Well, first and foremost, vote against the Dems in November. I know, I know…you don’t like the republicans either! O.k. Then go vote for the Green Party and pat yourself on the back for being “principled.” After that you can have your juice box and sandwich with the crusts cut off and take a nap. For the rest of us adults, we’ll choose a candidate with a chance of winning.
Simply put, there is job-creating capital out there waiting to be invested. It’s not being invested because no one has any idea what’s coming from this administration. For example, if you were a business owner with money, would you be spending it to reinvest or hire new employees if you thought your taxes were going to go up in January? Of course not. Doing something as simple as throwing the Dems out of the House would improve the fragile psyche of the economy.
But simply voting Republican isn’t enough. Pressure needs to be applied to those we vote for to do things like extending the Bush tax cuts for everyone. Other taxes need to be cut…payroll and capital gains, for example. Enact legislation which gives people the option to opt out of the slush fund that is Social Security. Limit Medicare to those that need it; not simply those that are old enough to get it. Significantly amend Obamacare and gut Fannie and Freddie.
Until we get the economy back on-track, nothing else matters. And there’s a lot going on that needs to be addressed beyond the economy…like why we’re ignoring Iran’s getting all nuclear and stuff.
It’s September…the kids are back in school, I get to drink new seasonal beer, and I get to watch football. More important, however, is the election coming up. We need to vote the Dems out…and then get ready for 2012, when we can vote out the guy who looks silly riding his bike. And don’t worry…I’ll be posting a lot more than I did in August in an effort to get you through these tough times.
‘But here’s what I can tell you: After 18 months, I have never been more confident that our nation is headed in the right direction.’
New U.S. claims for unemployment benefits unexpectedly climbed to a nine-month high last week, yet another setback to the frail economic recovery.
Sigh. I’ve come to the rather grim conclusion that the economy won’t improve until we rid ourselves of this charlatan. Why? Contrary to B.O.’s assertions, it isn’t because of how deep the ditch was. It’s because no one with a business has any confidence in any of his decisions on the economy. The same goes for Nancy Pelosi, Tim Geithner, Harry Reid, etc.
We’re not headed in the right direction. In fact, I’m not sure we’re headed in any direction. What is the president/Congress doing to create jobs? Can anyone tell me? So far, we’ve had several different deficit-driving stimulus packages, which only propped up state governments, or hired more government employees, or paid some pension funds. None of that did anything to improve the economy, and anyone with an eighth grade education knew that it wouldn’t before it was attempted.
What else? We’ve passed healthcare legislation which the government admits won’t control costs, and is directly responsible for current premiums going up. The new financial regulation law will significantly increase the size of the federal government, and impact just about every financial transaction that anybody takes part in. Oh, and it does nothing to deal with HUD, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, all of which caused the housing bubble and started the domino effect of economic collapse.
Our economy isn’t in a malaise. It isn’t stuck. And there are no green shoots. It’s simply waiting. Waiting for the anti-business, anti-private property, pro-big government liberals to lose their control over the direction of this country. Unfortunately, while it waits, more small businesses shut their doors, more big businesses downsize, and more people lose their jobs.
Yes, I know there haven’t been many posts lately. I’ve been busy. And until someone wants to pay me for this blog, then my job security will need to be priority number 1. No mom, no one has complained.
With all of that being said, can anyone explain to me why we need a mosque near Ground Zero? I know I’ve asked before, but with the recent acceleration of the issue, I’m asking again. And no, I’m not questioning whether one can be built there, obviously it can be. But why should it be built there? What’s the point? Is this really the best place to prove that we, as Americans, are tolerant of everyone?
And what are the motives of the muslims building the mosque? Peace and understanding? B.S. You could have the same peace and understanding if you built it somewhere else. And no, your right to practice your religion is not being inhibited in any way by making you build the mosque elsewhere. Moreover, if your real motivation was truly a thing of butterflies and kittens and pretty rainbows and dew-drops, why give it a name that basically means muslim conquest? I’m not sure that forcing a mosque down the throat of a majority of New Yorkers, and Americans, that don’t want it speaks of tolerance.
And what does this have to do with our esteemed president, you ask? Well, on Friday, he said this:
In his speech on Friday, Mr Obama said: ‘Let me be clear: As a citizen and as President I believe that Muslims have the same right to practise their religion as everyone else in this country.
‘That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community centre on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.’
As one could expect, that went over like a ton of bricks. If the Republicans win back the House (and possibly Senate) this fall, a thank-you letter should be sent to the president.
House minority leader John Boehner’s response,
‘The fact that someone has the right to do something doesn’t necessarily make it the right thing to do. That is the essence of tolerance, peace and understanding….’
Say what you want about Boehner (I tend to like him), but he’s absolutely right (except that I don’t think they have the “right” to do it). If the muslims attempting to get this thing built want to show how much they love everybody, then they should share their love elsewhere. The people don’t want it, period; and with good reason. Lest we forget that it was muslims who brought the twin-towers down, in the name of their religion. I don’t care if they were “radicalized.” They weren’t Christians, or Catholics, or Quakers.
Simply put, there’s no justifiable reason for the mosque to go there. In fact, the mere fact that the builders want to put it there reveals their own insensitivity. Of course, I’m not dumb enough to think those building the mosque are doing so with good intentions.
Question: what would happen if, after a small group of Christian Americans set off a bomb in the middle of Mecca because they wanted to start another Crusade, another group of moderate Christians wanted to build a church near the site of the bombing to send a message of peace and love? Well, it’s actually a trick question because non-muslims aren’t allowed in Mecca. That fact notwithstanding, even if the moderate Christians were granted the opportunity to build the church, I would give it about a week before some “radicalized” muslims bombed it into oblivion. And how would the American left respond? Likely how many responded to 9/11: it’s our fault and we should work to understand their grievances. We’re destroying ourselves, and our esteemed president is leading the way.
Well, that’s a relief. For a minute I thought the federal government was going to tell the states they actually had to balance their budgets, which would certainly have been awkward. But the good guys pulled it out in the clutch by providing $26 billion to the states,
Democrats countered that the money would provide vital aid to states struggling with rising Medicaid costs, and would help local governments to avert public-sector layoffs in the autumn.
Gee, makes you wonder how much easier it would be for state governments to balance their budgets without a huge federal entitlement program shoved down their throats.
Democrats said the legislation would enable state and local governments to avert layoffs or to create 290,000 public sector jobs this fall.
“Avert layoffs or to create 290,000 public sector jobs this fall.” Well which is it? Wait, don’t tell me, because you don’t really know. 290,000 additional public sector jobs? For what? When exactly does the government admit that it only creates government jobs by spending our taxes?
The economy is slowly grinding to a halt. What does the dawdler in chief do? Sends his wife and daughter on a spit-in-America’s face trip to Spain, on our dime. What does Congress do? Throws more money at stuff that can’t improve the economy: entitlements and government jobs. At this point, I’d be more accepting of the government doing something bold and stupid then simply more of the same; at least we wouldn’t simply be watching the economy crash in slow motion.
I guess I’ll just look at the bright side. At least I’ll get to hear progressive talk radio tell me why paying off state debts was the “right thing to do.”