33,000 inmates ordered released in California. I blame public education.
With today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision, I have yet another reason to be thankful for leaving California. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ordered the release of 33,000 inmates in California, due to continued violations of “inmates’ rights to adequate care for their mental and physical health.” In other words, the prisons are overcrowded.
Don’t worry, I’m not going to analyze the decision, or give my opinion on whether the Court made the correct ruling. I’m not going to go into the ideological breakdown of the judges, or the nitty-gritty details of the law at issue. Finally, I’m not going to respond to the pot-heads who will inevitably argue that there wouldn’t be overcrowding if drugs were legalized. Instead, I’m going to address this:
California Gov. Jerry Brown said he ‘will take all necessary steps to protect public safety.’
(…Except build a new prison so we aren’t forced to release 33,000 felons). It goes without saying that “public safety” is certainly a purpose of any government. In fact, I would imagine everyone would agree that it’s a primary purpose of government. Unfortunately, this purpose has been diluted in many states because public safety has to increasingly compete with unnecessary human interest projects that are forced down our collective throats by do-gooders and/or liberals. In other words, California can’t pay to house its criminals because it spends too much friggin’ money on crap.
Gigantic example of the crap: public education. California is $15.4 billion in debt, and an astonishing one out of every four dollars spent goes to the education system. Who can forget the $578 million Robert F. Kennedy Community School in Los Angeles? The Los Angeles Unified School District spends $11,357.00 per pupil! Keep this cost in your head as you read this statement made by Doug Nielson, a government and economics teacher at Coalinga High School:
‘If we stick to our ideologies, our children are going to suffer. When somebody says well, extending these taxes is a tax increase, you’ve got a mindset there that says the dollars are more important than the kids. And they can’t be. We can’t afford to do that. You can’t have first-class teaching on a Third World budget.’
This is the complete lunacy that we face with the public education system. “Third World budget?” The United States spends more per pupil than any other nation in the world. And for what? Is there any question that private schools can do a better job, at less cost? While saving money for the government to keep felons off the streets?
It’s in this way that liberals have won. People no longer seriously question why the government is spending $11,000.00 per student. Heck, most of the people complaining about the 33,000 inmates being released won’t even remember that $578 million of tax-payer money was used to build a school.
At some point, every community needs to answer a basic question: What is the role of government? Do you want more cops on the the street and criminals in prison…or do you want your government to spend $11,000.00 per pupil at the public schools? The government can’t afford to do everything, and if you don’t decide on what our taxes are paying for, somebody else will. Today in California, the Supreme Court made the decision.