Home > Uncategorized > Just Punishment for Pollution?

Just Punishment for Pollution?

Barack Obama plans to punish BP with tax hike as Gulf spill worsens

In the face of what may become the largest environmental disaster ever, President Obama did what he does best: gave a flowery speech and increased our taxes.

Oil companies face an immediate tax rise of 1 cent per barrel to help to pay for the clean-up in the Gulf of Mexico under proposed legislation rushed out by the White House yesterday.

The measure…would put an extra $500 million over ten years into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which covers damage caused by such disasters.

Now, this sounds like a swell idea.  “Tax those big oil companies!  Look at what they’re willing do to the environment just to make money!”  As an initial point: I’ll be the first to say that BP, and all other responsible parties, should have to pay for all the damage they did.  But enough already with the knee-jerk rhetoric and nonsense about getting off of oil.  If other efficient energy-producing technology were available, we would be using it (please ignore the 800 lb. gorilla known as nuclear energy).  We should continue to drill.

Now, back to the point.  There’s a saying that always rings true: companies don’t pay taxes.  Instead, they pass them onto the consumer as part of the price of the product.  So, increasing BP’s taxes on a barrel of oil won’t affect BP at all, but will increase the cost of gas to us.

The purpose of the tax is to aid in cleaning up spills.  In other words, BP will not be paying to clean anything…we will be.

Advertisements
  1. mary
    May 13, 2010 at 5:28 PM

    We will be paying for it, tax or no tax. While I appreciate that you believe BP should pay for any and all costs and expenses for the damage that was done, the simple fact is: They won’t. We will. Their profits won’t fall by a dime. As with all businesses, all expenses are passed along to the consumer.

    The beauty of the tax, as Obama well knows, is that it will merely fatten the government coffers. And we already know how well our elected officials resist the temptation to dip into any pot of revenue (social security). Thus, we will pay whatever it costs BP to clean up the mess and we will pay the 1% tax as well. And Obama gets yet another stream of revenue.

  2. May 13, 2010 at 9:00 PM

    I don’t have much problem with paying BP for it. That’s business. I have to pay increased costs for most products because of lawsuits. I don’t want to be paying the govt. for it. You bring up a good point with the Social Security analogy. I had thought about that..will this just be another slush fund? It’s been around since 1990, and I don’t know if the govt. has tapped it for anything else yet.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: